This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stevens, P. Articles by O’Mahony, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Metrics, Targets and Performance

National Institute of Economic and Social Research and Medium Term Strategy Group, Ministry of Economic Development, New Zealand., p.stevens{at}niesr.ac.uk

Lucy Stokes

National Institute of Economic and Social Research.

Mary O’Mahony

National Institute of Economic Research and Birmingham Business School.

The setting and use of targets in the public sector has generated a growing amount of interest in the UK. This has occurred at a time when more analysts and policymakers are grasping the nettle of measuring performance in and of the public sector. We outline a typology of performance indicators and a set of desiderata. We compare the outcome of a performance management system - star ratings for acute hospital trusts in England - with a productivity measure analogous to those used in the analysis of the private sector. We find that the two are almost entirely unrelated. Although this may be the case for entirely proper reasons, it does raise questions as to the appropriateness of such indicators of performance, particularly over the long term.

Key Words: Public sector performance • Productivity • Acute Trusts

National Institute Economic Review, Vol. 197, No. 1, 80-92 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/002795010619700103


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?